Atlas of Polymers

The Engineering Polymers Era (1961-1979)

1970

Polybutylene (PB-1)

The Rise and Fall of a Promising Polymer

thermoplastic·polyolefin·Shell Chemical Company, Chemische Werke Hüls

In March 1970, students at the University of Michigan held a three-day “teach-in” on the environment that helped set the pattern for the first Earth Day a month later, one of the opening acts of the modern American environmental movement. It is an odd year, on the face of it, for a new petroleum-derived plastic to be finding its footing. But that is exactly what was happening to polybutylene, a polyolefin whose entire pitch to the construction industry was environmental in the practical, unglamorous sense: pipe that did not need mining, smelting or a plumber’s torch to install, and that promised to outlast the copper it replaced.

Plate I

A large crowd of young people, many in winter coats, gathered outdoors around a speaker at a podium with a microphone, seen from behind the speaker.
A 1970 environmental teach-in at the University of Michigan, part of the wave of activism that led to the first Earth Day that April, the same year a new plastic pipe was being pitched as the practical alternative to mined and smelted copper.Wikimedia Commons

A Late Arrival to the Olefin Family

Isotactic poly(1-butene) had been made in the laboratory as early as 1954, in the same wave of Ziegler-Natta catalyst research that had just produced high-density polyethylene and isotactic polypropylene, but turning it into an industrial material took much longer. Chemische Werke Hüls in Germany ran the first industrial production, under the name Vestolen BT, starting in 1964. In the United States, Mobil Oil built its own small plant at Taft, Louisiana in 1968 to develop the polymer independently; as the 1970s opened, that plant passed to the Witco Chemical Corporation, which began marketing its own grade, Whitron, into industrial and specialty markets. Shell Chemical Company was running a parallel research program through this same period, and it was Shell’s version of the resin, reaching full commercial production later in the decade, that eventually carried polybutylene into millions of American homes as pressurized water pipe.

Plate II

A close-up of a blue propane-torch flame heating a joint between two copper pipes, with a bright bead of melted solder running around the fitting.
Sweating a copper joint, the skilled, torch-and-solder trade that PB-1 pipe, joined instead with plastic fittings, was sold as a faster and cheaper alternative to.Wikimedia Commons

A Backbone With an Ethyl Group

Poly(1-butene)‘s chain is built the same way polypropylene’s is, just one carbon longer at the side branch: instead of a methyl group hanging off every other backbone carbon, PB-1 carries a full ethyl group. Made isotactic by a Ziegler-Natta catalyst, those ethyl groups line up in a regular spiral that lets the chains pack into a genuinely crystalline solid, giving PB-1 a useful combination of flexibility and long-term strength under sustained pressure and heat, precisely the profile a pressurized hot-water pipe needs. What makes the material unusual, and eventually made it notorious, is that the chain does not settle into its final packing right away. Fresh from the mould, PB-1 first solidifies into a looser, metastable crystal arrangement; only over the following week or two, at ordinary room temperature, does it reorganize itself into the denser, more stable structure the material is actually specified to have. Warm the polymer back up past the point where that stable structure holds, and the whole slow rearrangement can run in reverse. No other common commercial polymer performs quite this trick, and manufacturers had to design around it: a PB-1 pipe fitting is not really finished the moment it leaves the mould.

Where the Pipe Went

That combination of pressure resistance, flexibility and heat tolerance made PB-1 look ideal for exactly the application it is now most associated with: hot and cold water plumbing, particularly the pressurized supply lines and underfloor heating loops that copper handled less gracefully. It also found real, if quieter, roles as a peel-seal layer in food packaging film and as a processing modifier blended into other polyolefins.

The Reckoning

The pipe’s American career did not end well, and it is worth being precise about why, because the actual cause is less romantic than the polymer’s own crystal chemistry. Municipal water suppliers in North America almost universally disinfect the supply with chlorine or chloramine, and both are aggressive oxidizers. Sitting inside a polybutylene pipe for years on end, that treated water slowly attacked the polymer chain itself, embrittling it from the inside; the plastic fittings used to join the pipe, rather than the pipe alone, often failed first. The damage was invisible until it wasn’t: pipes installed through the late 1970s, 1980s and into the mid-1990s began splitting and leaking inside walls and slab foundations, sometimes years after installation. The resulting litigation, above all the nationwide class action Cox v. Shell Oil Co., became one of the largest product-liability settlements in the history of American home construction, and polybutylene plumbing effectively disappeared from new construction in North America by the late 1990s.

Plate III

A water-stained, cracked patch of dark brown discolouration spreading across white ceiling tiles above a tiled bathroom corner.
The kind of damage, from a slow leak hidden behind a wall or ceiling, that fuelled the class-action litigation which ended polybutylene's career in American plumbing.Wikimedia Commons

What Survived

Polybutylene did not vanish from the world, even if it left American plumbing supply houses. In much of Europe, where water disinfection practices and installation standards differ, PB-1 pipe remains in routine use for hot-water and underfloor-heating systems, valued for the same creep resistance and flexibility that made it attractive in the first place. Cross-linked polyethylene, PEX, became the material North American plumbers reached for instead, cheaper to install than copper, without the specific failure mode that ended polybutylene’s American story.

Plate IV

A flat-lay photograph of plumbing tools and brass fittings on a cloth surface: a crimping tool, a pipe cutter, push-fit couplings, a tee fitting and several stainless steel clamp rings.
The tools of PEX plumbing, the cross-linked polyethylene tubing that took over the market polybutylene lost.Wikimedia Commons

A Fair Hearing, Decades Later

Polybutylene’s American reputation was made almost entirely by its worst chapter, which is not quite fair to the chemistry. The polymer did what it was designed to do; the water running through it, and the fittings it was joined with, did not cooperate over the multi-decade timescale the pipe itself could easily survive. Its story is a genuinely useful caution for materials science more broadly: a polymer can pass every test that matters in a laboratory and still meet a failure mode nobody thought to test for, because nobody expected chlorinated tap water to be the thing attacking it.

values with [n] cite the numbered references·estimates are flagged·“not yet available” and “N/A” are honest states, not gaps

polybutylene repeat unit n

Polybutylene repeat unit

Abbreviation
PB-1
Type
polymer family (hub)
CAS number
9003-28-5
Resin ID code
none assigned
Formula
(C4H8)nThe bracketed unit is the chain's repeat unit and does not indicate which polymorphic crystal form is present. Isotactic poly(1-butene) is polymorphic, with at least four crystal forms, so a single crystal structure or density value does not represent the material across its post-molding aging timeline (form II converts to form I over ~2–14 days).
Repeat unit (BigSMILES)
{[][$]CC(CC)[$][]}
IUPAC name
Poly(1-butene)
Synonyms
polybutene-1; poly(1-butene); PB-1
Also known as
polybutene-1poly(1-butene)

Chemical family
polyolefin
Backbone class
carbon-chain
Polymerization mechanism
coordination
Constitutional monomer
1-Butene
Polymer class
thermoplastic

Year of origin
1970
Era
The Engineering Polymers Era (1961-1979)
Key figures
Shell Chemical Company · Chemische Werke Hüls
Events referenced
University of Michigan environmental teach-in, a precursor to the first Earth Day (March 1970)

Polymerization type
coordination chain-growth
Common monomers (feedstocks)
1-butene
Catalysts
Ziegler-Natta type catalysts

Produced by catalytic (Ziegler-Natta) polymerization of 1-butene monomer to give isotactic, semi-crystalline PB-1.

Tacticity
Isotactic.
Crystal structure
Polymorphic with at least four crystal forms. Melt-solidified PB-1 first forms a metastable tetragonal phase (Form II), which irreversibly transforms to a thermodynamically stable hexagonal phase (Form I) over roughly 2–14 days at room temperature. This is a slow solid-state transition that is the defining quirk of this material.
Typical crystallinity
38–58 %[2]Wypych: 45–55% conventional (47–58% form I, 38% form II); Mark: 48–55% (form I, after extrusion)

Molecular weight

Number average (Mn)
20000–300000 g/mol[2]Wypych; Mark's typical commercial range is narrower at ~70,000–75,000 g/mol
Mass average (Mw)
85000–2200000 g/mol[2]Wypych; Mark's typical commercial range is narrower at ~725,000–750,000 g/mol
Dispersity (Mw/Mn)
4–12[2]Wypych (Ziegler-Natta); Mark reports 10–11 for Ziegler-Natta, 1.02 for anionic polymerization
Mark-Houwink constants: [η] = K · Ma
SolventTM rangeKa
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene[3]408 Knot given (GPC)0.0118 mL/g0.729
decalin[3]388 K~900,000 g/mol (single-point LS measurement)0.00949 mL/g0.73

Tg ~-21°C.

Density
0.87–0.95 g/cm³[2]20°C, general 0.87–0.92 g/cm³ (0.95 g/cm³ crystalline); Mark reports crystalline density by polymorph: Form I (hexagonal, stable) 0.951, Form II (tetragonal, metastable) 0.902, Form III (orthorhombic) 0.905 g/cm³, consistent with the Form II -> Form I density increase on aging
Melt flow index
1–30 g/10min[2]190°C/10 kg; Mark separately reports 0.4 g/10min under ASTM D1238 condition E (190°C/2.16 kg): different load, not directly comparable
Refractive index
1.5125–1.5246[2]exp., 20°C; Mark's isotactic value (1.5125) matches the lower bound
Transmittance
not yet available
Haze
not yet available
Gloss
not yet available
Water absorption
[2]<0.03%, 24h water immersion, 23°C (ASTM D570; Wypych and Mark agree)
Dielectric constant
2.53[2]100 Hz-1 MHz; Mark corroborates at 10³-10⁶ Hz
Dielectric strength
not yet available
Electrical conductivity
not yet available

Glass transition (Tg)
-21 (-45–-17) °C[2]exp.; form I -20.5°C, form II -26.9°C; Mark's DMA measurement gives -25.2 to -17.2°C (248–256 K), consistent
Melting temperature (Tm)
97–142 °C[2]DSC, isotactic (Wypych 97–142°C general; by form: I 120–135°C, I' 90–100°C, II 110–120°C, III 90–100°C). Mark gives higher form-specific values: I 138–142°C, II 120–130°C, III 101–110°C; syndiotactic ~50°C (both agree)
Crystallization (Tc)
72 °C[2]reported as "rapid crystallization temperature"
Heat deflection (HDT)
54–60 °C[3]1.82 MPa, ASTM D648
Decomposition onset
300–440 °C[2]form I
Thermal conductivity
0.22 W/(m·K)[3]ASTM C177; Wypych separately reports 0.1344–0.22 W/(m·K) for the melt

Tensile modulus
150–295 MPa[2]Wypych 150–295 MPa; Mark's ASTM D638 measurement gives 290–295 MPa (matches Wypych's upper bound and its separately reported "elastic modulus" of 290–295 MPa)
Yield strength
12–18 MPa[2]Wypych 12–15 MPa; Mark's ASTM D638 measurement gives 16–18 MPa
Tensile strength at break
27–45 MPa[2]Wypych 27–45 MPa; Mark's ASTM D638 measurement gives 32–35 MPa
Elongation at break
200–400 %[2]Wypych 200–400%; Mark's ASTM D638 measurement gives 275–320%
Impact strength (Izod)
640–800 J/m[3]notched, ASTM D256; not given in the Wypych entry
Impact strength (Charpy)
not yet available
Hardness
55–65 Shore D[3]ASTM D2240
Flexural modulus
250–450 MPa[2]Wypych 250–450 MPa; Mark's ASTM D790 measurement gives 375–380 MPa
Poisson's ratio
0.47[2]exp., 25°C (Wypych and Mark agree); calc.=0.393
Coefficient of friction
not yet available

Solvent: acids
good[2]dilute and concentrated
Solvent: alcohols
good[2]
Solvent: alkalis
good[2]
Solvent: aliphatic hydrocarbons
good[2]
Solvent: aromatic hydrocarbons
poor[2]
Solvent: esters
poor[2]
Solvent: greases & oils
poor[2]
Solvent: halogenated hydrocarbons
good[2]
Solvent: ketones
poor[2]
Weathering / UV
not yet available
Hydrolysis resistance
Not applicable
Flammability (UL94)
not yet available
Limiting oxygen index
not yet available
Solubility parameter (δ)
not yet available

Gas permeability

not yet available

Polymer-solvent interaction parameter (χ)

n-decane
0.3[3]115–135°C; tacticity not specified in source
benzene
0.49[3]135°C; tacticity not specified in source
cyclohexane
0.2[3]135°C; tacticity not specified in source

Processing methods
injection moldingextrusion (pipe/fittings)
Drying required
not yet determined
Processing temperature
not yet available
Shrinkage rate
2.5–5 %[2]

  • Pipingpressurized hot and cold water piping systemsOutstanding creep, cracking, and impact resistance make PB-1 a technically preferred (if commercially niche) material for pressure piping.
  • Medical & aerospacemedical/pharmaceutical equipment · food packaging · aviation and aerospace components

Recyclable
Yes
Biodegradable
No
Degradation pathway
not yet available

LD50 (oral, rat)
not yet available
NFPA health
1[2]HMIS rating, 0–4 scale
NFPA flammability
1[2]HMIS rating, 0–4 scale
NFPA reactivity
2[2]HMIS rating, 0–4 scale
Carcinogenic classification
not listed by ACGIH, NIOSH, NTP[2]

  1. [1]Polybutene-1 (PB-1) properties and applicationsWeb search summary (PBPSA, LyondellBasell, ScienceDirect)Accessed 2026-07-14https://www.pbpsa.com/pb1-material/what-is-polybutene-1[search-pb1]
  2. [2]Handbook of PolymersChemTec Publishinghttps://www.worldcat.org/isbn/9781895198928[handbook-wypych-2016]
  3. [3]Polymer Data HandbookOxford University Presshttps://search.worldcat.org/search?q=Polymer+Data+Handbook+Mark+1999[handbook-mark-1999]

Illustrations

  1. Plate IA 1970 environmental teach-in at the University of Michigan, part of the wave of activism that led to the first Earth Day that April, the same year a new plastic pipe was being pitched as the practical alternative to mined and smelted copper.University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability from Ann Arbor · CC BY 2.0Wikimedia Commons
  2. Plate IISweating a copper joint, the skilled, torch-and-solder trade that PB-1 pipe, joined instead with plastic fittings, was sold as a faster and cheaper alternative to.neffk (talk) · CC BY 2.0Wikimedia Commons
  3. Plate IIIThe kind of damage, from a slow leak hidden behind a wall or ceiling, that fuelled the class-action litigation which ended polybutylene's career in American plumbing.Atomicdragon136 · CC BY 3.0Wikimedia Commons
  4. Plate IVThe tools of PEX plumbing, the cross-linked polyethylene tubing that took over the market polybutylene lost.Tomwsulcer · CC BY-SA 3.0Wikimedia Commons