Skip to content
ARMAG
Submachine gun

M50 Reising

Harrington & Richardson Arms CompanySecond World War

Also known as Reising Model 50

A submachine gun with a wooden stock and forend, a perforated barrel jacket and a curved box magazine hanging below the receiver.

Image credit

Title
File:Reising SMG Model 50 noBG.png
Author
Curiosandrelics(attribution required)
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0
Source
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reising_SMG_Model_50_noBG.png
A Reising Model 50 submachine gun.
Muzzle energy

How Muzzle energy is calculated

E = ½ · m · v²

Inputs

  • m14.90 g230.0 grverifiedsource230 gr as published, converted at 1 gr = 0.06479891 g.
  • v271.3 m/s890.0 fpsverifiedMeasured with a 127 mm barrel, not this arm's 279 mm. Velocity outside the sourced range is not projected.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

548.4 J404.5 ft·lbf
Muzzle velocity

How Muzzle velocity is calculated

nearest sourced barrel length, no extrapolation

Inputs

  • v at 127 mm271.3 m/s890.0 fpsverifiedsource890 ft/s as published, converted at 1 ft/s = 0.3048 m/s.

Assumptions

  • This figure belongs to a 127 mm barrel. It is shown because it is the closest measurement that exists, not because it applies here.

1 of 1 inputs link to their source.

271.3 m/s890.0 fps
Loaded mass

How Loaded mass is calculated

m_loaded = m_empty + m_magazine + n · m_cartridge

Not calculated: m_magazine has no sourced figure yet. Nothing is substituted for a missing input.

Assumptions

  • One magazine, filled to the stated capacity. Spare magazines, optics, slings and lights are the owner’s, not the arm’s.

2 of 4 inputs link to their source.

not recordednot recorded
Free recoil

How Free recoil is calculated

E_recoil = ½ · m_firearm · v_recoil²

Inputs

  • m_firearm3.1 kg6.834 lbestimatedsourceM50, from the infobox; no inline citation is given there.
  • v_recoil1.304 m/s4.279 fpsestimated

Assumptions

  • Propellant gas momentum is excluded: ARMAG does not record charge weights. This is therefore a lower bound on the real free recoil, consistent between entries but smaller than a figure that includes the gas term.
  • Free recoil: the arm is unrestrained. Stock design, muzzle devices, stance and shooter mass are not modelled, because none of them is a property of the arm.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

2.636 J1.944 ft·lbfestimated
Capacity

How Capacity is calculated

as published for the primary chambering

Inputs

  • capacity20estimatedsourcepublished as a 12- or 20-round detachable box magazine, with a 30-round aftermarket magazine also produced, from the infobox, uncited there.

1 of 1 inputs link to their source.

20estimated

Derived figures

Computed from the sourced values above. Open ƒ on any figure for the formula, its inputs, and the assumptions it makes.

Momentum

How Momentum is calculated

p = m · v

Inputs

  • m14.90 g230.0 grverifiedsource230 gr as published, converted at 1 gr = 0.06479891 g.
  • v271.3 m/s890.0 fpsverifiedMeasured with a 127 mm barrel, not this arm's 279 mm. Velocity outside the sourced range is not projected.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

4.043 kg·m/s
Sectional density

How Sectional density is calculated

SD = mass(gr) / (7000 · diameter(in)²)

Inputs

  • mass14.90 g230.0 grverifiedsource230 gr as published, converted at 1 gr = 0.06479891 g.
  • diameter11.48 mm0.4520 inverifiedsourceC.I.P. G1, maximum bullet diameter.

Assumptions

  • Reported in the conventional lb/in² so it is directly comparable with published figures.

2 of 2 inputs link to their source.

0.1608 lb/in²
Power factor

How Power factor is calculated

PF = mass(gr) · velocity(fps) / 1000

Inputs

  • mass14.90 g230.0 grverifiedsource230 gr as published, converted at 1 gr = 0.06479891 g.
  • velocity271.3 m/s890.0 fpsverifiedMeasured with a 127 mm barrel, not this arm's 279 mm. Velocity outside the sourced range is not projected.

Assumptions

  • A competition classification defined by the IPSC and USPSA rulebooks, stated in their units. It describes a scoring category, not an effect.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

204.7 gr·fps/1000
Magazine dump

How Magazine dump is calculated

t = (n − 1) / (rpm / 60)

Inputs

  • n20estimatedsourcepublished as a 12- or 20-round detachable box magazine, with a 30-round aftermarket magazine also produced, from the infobox, uncited there.
  • rpm550 rpmestimatedsourceM50, from the infobox, uncited there.

Assumptions

  • Cyclic rate held for the whole magazine, no stoppages, trigger held down. A theoretical figure for comparing mechanisms, not a measured one.

2 of 2 inputs link to their source.

2.073 sestimated
Sight error at 1 mm

How Sight error at 1 mm is calculated

θ = atan(misalignment / sight radius)

Not calculated: sight radius has no sourced figure yet. Nothing is substituted for a missing input.

Assumptions

  • Shows what a stated aiming error costs. The misalignment is the reader’s figure; the site does not claim how well anyone aims.

No input on this calculation carries a clickable source yet.

not recordednot recorded

Variants

M55

A lighter M50 with a folding wire stock intended for paratroopers, sharing the same delayed-blowback action and .45 ACP chambering but built shorter for jump use.

Mass, empty
2.8 kg6.173 lbestimatedsource

from the infobox, uncited there.

Length, folded
565.1 mm22.25 inestimatedsource

stock retracted, from the infobox; an extended-stock length is not separately published for the M55.

Cyclic rate
500 rpmestimatedsource

from the infobox, uncited there.

VariantYearsChanges
M55—Mass, empty, Length, folded, Cyclic rate

Specifications

Every row here is generated from the schema, so a figure recorded on this entry cannot be missing from the table, and the same rows, read the same way, are what the comparison shows.

Identity
Fire modes
  • Semi-automatic
  • Fully automatic
Operating system
Blowback, lever-delayed
Designed in
United States
Produced in
Introduced
1941
Production
not recorded
Dimensions and mass
Mass, empty
3.1 kg6.834 lbestimatedsource

M50, from the infobox; no inline citation is given there.

Magazine, empty
not recorded
Length
895.4 mm35.25 inestimatedsource

M50, from the infobox, uncited there.

Length, folded
not recorded
Width
not recorded
Height
not recorded
Barrel length
279 mm10.98 inestimatedsource

M50, from the infobox, uncited there.

Sights and rifling
Sight radius
not recorded
Sight height over bore
not recorded
Rifling twist
not recorded
Twist direction
not recorded
Grooves
not recorded
Sight graduation
not recorded
Operation
Cyclic rate
550 rpmestimatedsource

M50, from the infobox, uncited there.

Trigger pull
not recorded
Effective range
274 m299.7 ydestimatedsource

Converted from a published 300 yd maximum range, from the infobox, uncited there.

Units produced
not recorded
Launch price
not recorded

Chamberings

Scale

A to-scale outline against family siblings. The dimensions are sourced; the shape is a representative outline for the type, and says so.

  • M50 Reising895.4 mm35.25 inheight not recorded

Representative outline: the dimensions are sourced, the shape is not. Overall length, and barrel length where recorded, are drawn from this entry's own figures; the profile is a generic one for the firearm type and says nothing about this arm's actual contours. M50 Reising records no height, so its outline is drawn at the type's proportion. That height is part of the shape, not a measurement.

Compare this against any other entry →

Detail

Harrington & Richardson brought the Reising into production in 1941 because the US military could not get enough Thompson submachine guns to go around: the Reising cost a fraction of the Thompson’s price and was lighter and more accurate, so the Marine Corps adopted it as a stopgap while Thompson production caught up with wartime demand. Its delayed-blowback action works by a tilting bolt rather than a simple mass-and-spring blowback: the rear of the bolt seats into a curved recess machined into the receiver, and firing pressure has to push that curved surface back to horizontal before the bolt can travel rearward, buying the fraction of a second a closed-bolt, delayed design needs to keep chamber pressure safe.

That mechanism, and the close manufacturing tolerances it needed, turned out to be the Reising’s undoing in the field. In the sand, mud and humidity of the Solomon Islands campaign the action fouled easily, and minor damage to a magazine’s feed lips, or grit worked into one, could put it out of action entirely, in a design where interchangeable parts and field maintenance had not been given the same priority as cost. Marines came to distrust the gun badly enough that some discarded it for the bolt-action M1903 Springfield rather than carry a Reising into combat. The folding-stock M55 variant made for paratroopers made an already troubled design worse: its stock was flimsy enough to fold under recoil while firing.

Two further derivatives are not modelled here. The M60 was a semi-automatic-only carbine built for training and police sales rather than combat use, which this site’s taxonomy classes as a carbine rather than a submachine gun; and the M65 was a .22 Long Rifle training version built from 1944 to 1946, a different cartridge family from the M50’s .45 ACP. Both are separate designs built on the same action rather than variants of this entry.

Every figure in this entry traces to the Wikipedia infobox without an inline citation and is recorded as estimated. No twist rate is published, and the M55’s extended-stock length is not separately published, so only its folded length is recorded.

References

This entry's own bibliography. Every citation key on this page resolves into this list.

  1. M50 Reising · Wikipedia · 1358530557 · read 2026-09-09 · CC BY-SA 4.0

Last verified 2026-09-09 · review status: agent-populated