Skip to content
ARMAG
Rifle

ArmaLite AR-18

ArmaLiteEarly Cold War

A rifle with a plain tubular receiver, a folding wire stock, a curved box magazine and a slotted flash suppressor at the muzzle.

Image credit

Title
File:Armalite AR18-IMG 6519 noBG.png
Author
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Rama(attribution required)
Licence
CC BY-SA 4.0
Source
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Armalite_AR18-IMG_6519_noBG.png
An ArmaLite AR-18 rifle, showing its stamped-steel receiver and folding wire stock, on display at the Parachute Regiment and Airborne Forces Museum.
Muzzle energy

How Muzzle energy is calculated

E = ½ · m · v²

Inputs

  • m4.018 g62.01 grverifiedsource62 gr as published, converted to grams.
  • v932.3 m/s3,059 fpsestimatedInterpolated between sourced measurements at 368.3 mm and 508 mm.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

1,746 J1,288 ft·lbfestimated
Muzzle velocity

How Muzzle velocity is calculated

linear interpolation between the two nearest sourced barrel lengths

Inputs

  • v at 368.3 mm905.3 m/s2,970 fpsverifiedsourceTable 2-1, muzzle velocity for the M4: 2,970 fps.
  • v at 508 mm944.9 m/s3,100 fpsverifiedsourceTable 2-1, muzzle velocity for the M16A2: 3,100 fps. The M855 is the manual's service round for that rifle.

Assumptions

  • Velocity is assumed to vary linearly between the two measurements. Over a short span that is a reasonable reading of the data; it is not a law.

2 of 2 inputs link to their source.

932.3 m/s3,059 fpsestimated
Loaded mass

How Loaded mass is calculated

m_loaded = m_empty + m_magazine + n · m_cartridge

Not calculated: m_magazine has no sourced figure yet. Nothing is substituted for a missing input.

Assumptions

  • One magazine, filled to the stated capacity. Spare magazines, optics, slings and lights are the owner’s, not the arm’s.

3 of 4 inputs link to their source.

not recordednot recorded
Free recoil

How Free recoil is calculated

E_recoil = ½ · m_firearm · v_recoil²

Inputs

  • m_firearm3.04 kg6.702 lbestimatedsourceConverted from 6.7 lb, empty, from the infobox; no inline citation is given there.
  • v_recoil1.232 m/s4.043 fpsestimated

Assumptions

  • Propellant gas momentum is excluded: ARMAG does not record charge weights. This is therefore a lower bound on the real free recoil, consistent between entries but smaller than a figure that includes the gas term.
  • Free recoil: the arm is unrestrained. Stock design, muzzle devices, stance and shooter mass are not modelled, because none of them is a property of the arm.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

2.308 J1.702 ft·lbfestimated
Capacity

How Capacity is calculated

as published for the primary chambering

Inputs

  • capacity30estimatedsourcepublished as 20, 30 or 40-round detachable box magazines, from the infobox, uncited there; 30 rounds recorded here as the most common capacity.

1 of 1 inputs link to their source.

30estimated

Derived figures

Computed from the sourced values above. Open ƒ on any figure for the formula, its inputs, and the assumptions it makes.

Momentum

How Momentum is calculated

p = m · v

Inputs

  • m4.018 g62.01 grverifiedsource62 gr as published, converted to grams.
  • v932.3 m/s3,059 fpsestimatedInterpolated between sourced measurements at 368.3 mm and 508 mm.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

3.746 kg·m/sestimated
Sectional density

How Sectional density is calculated

SD = mass(gr) / (7000 · diameter(in)²)

Inputs

  • mass4.018 g62.01 grverifiedsource62 gr as published, converted to grams.
  • diameter5.7 mm0.2244 inestimatedsourceNo free NATO dimensional standard is published. The C.I.P. datasheet for the .223 Remington, which shares this bullet, gives a cartridge-maximum bullet diameter of 5.70 mm.

Assumptions

  • Reported in the conventional lb/in² so it is directly comparable with published figures.

2 of 2 inputs link to their source.

0.1759 lb/in²estimated
Power factor

How Power factor is calculated

PF = mass(gr) · velocity(fps) / 1000

Inputs

  • mass4.018 g62.01 grverifiedsource62 gr as published, converted to grams.
  • velocity932.3 m/s3,059 fpsestimatedInterpolated between sourced measurements at 368.3 mm and 508 mm.

Assumptions

  • A competition classification defined by the IPSC and USPSA rulebooks, stated in their units. It describes a scoring category, not an effect.

1 of 2 inputs link to their source.

189.7 gr·fps/1000estimated
Magazine dump

How Magazine dump is calculated

t = (n − 1) / (rpm / 60)

Inputs

  • n30estimatedsourcepublished as 20, 30 or 40-round detachable box magazines, from the infobox, uncited there; 30 rounds recorded here as the most common capacity.
  • rpm750 rpmestimatedsourcefrom the infobox, uncited there.

Assumptions

  • Cyclic rate held for the whole magazine, no stoppages, trigger held down. A theoretical figure for comparing mechanisms, not a measured one.

2 of 2 inputs link to their source.

2.320 sestimated
Sight error at 1 mm

How Sight error at 1 mm is calculated

θ = atan(misalignment / sight radius)

Not calculated: sight radius has no sourced figure yet. Nothing is substituted for a missing input.

Assumptions

  • Shows what a stated aiming error costs. The misalignment is the reader’s figure; the site does not claim how well anyone aims.

No input on this calculation carries a clickable source yet.

not recordednot recorded

Variants

AR-180

The semi-automatic-only civilian version of the AR-18, sold in far greater numbers (around 21,000) than the select-fire military rifle itself, with the same gas system, cartridge and magazines but restricted to semi-automatic fire.

VariantYearsChanges
AR-180—Fire modes

Specifications

Every row here is generated from the schema, so a figure recorded on this entry cannot be missing from the table, and the same rows, read the same way, are what the comparison shows.

Identity
Type
Rifle
Fire modes
  • Semi-automatic
  • Fully automatic
Operating system
Gas, short-stroke piston
Designed in
United States
Produced in
Introduced
1969
Production
not recorded
Dimensions and mass
Mass, empty
3.04 kg6.702 lbestimatedsource

Converted from 6.7 lb, empty, from the infobox; no inline citation is given there.

Magazine, empty
not recorded
Length
965.2 mm38.00 inestimatedsource

Converted from 38 in, from the infobox; no inline citation is given there.

Length, folded
not recorded
Width
not recorded
Height
not recorded
Barrel length
463.6 mm18.25 inestimatedsource

Converted from 18.25 in, from the infobox; no inline citation is given there.

Sights and rifling
Sight radius
not recorded
Sight height over bore
not recorded
Rifling twist
not recorded
Twist direction
not recorded
Grooves
not recorded
Sight graduation
not recorded
Operation
Cyclic rate
750 rpmestimatedsource

from the infobox, uncited there.

Trigger pull
not recorded
Effective range
not recorded
Units produced
not recorded
Launch price
not recorded

Chamberings

Scale

A to-scale outline against family siblings. The dimensions are sourced; the shape is a representative outline for the type, and says so.

  • ArmaLite AR-18965.2 mm38.00 inheight not recorded

Representative outline: the dimensions are sourced, the shape is not. Overall length, and barrel length where recorded, are drawn from this entry's own figures; the profile is a generic one for the firearm type and says nothing about this arm's actual contours. ArmaLite AR-18 records no height, so its outline is drawn at the type's proportion. That height is part of the shape, not a measurement.

Compare this against any other entry →

Detail

ArmaLite designed the AR-18 to make money a second time from a rifle concept it had already lost once: once Colt held the AR-15/M16 licence, ArmaLite could not profit further from that design, so Arthur Miller scaled down the earlier AR-16 into a new 5.56mm rifle in 1963 that did not infringe Colt’s rights. Where the AR-15 depended on forged and precisely machined aluminium, the AR-18 was built largely from stamped and pinned sheet steel, a construction any licensee with modest tooling could reproduce without Colt’s supply chain or its close machining tolerances; the point of the design was that a country could build it locally rather than depend on imports.

No major military adopted it. American trials in 1964 found its reliability varied between ammunition lots, and British trials in 1966 judged it unsatisfactory in mud and sand; by the time either concluded, the M16 already filled the role a rifle like it would have taken. What the AR-18 achieved instead was a long licensing history: Howa built it in Japan from 1970 to 1974 and later developed it into the Type 89, Sterling Armaments built it in Britain from 1979 to 1985, and it was reworked into other rifles including Singapore’s SAR-80 and prototypes attempted by the Philippines’ Elisco Tool. Its stamped-steel receiver and rotating bolt on twin operating rods, driven by a short-stroke gas piston rather than the AR-15’s direct-impingement system, became a recognisable mechanical lineage of its own, echoed later in rifles like the FN FNC and the SA80.

This entry’s weight, length, barrel length and cyclic rate all trace to the Wikipedia infobox without an inline citation, so each is recorded as estimated. The semi-automatic-only AR-180 sold in far greater numbers than the select-fire AR-18 itself and is recorded here as a variant, since it changes only fire modes and nothing about the action or operating system. No twist rate is published for the rifle.

References

This entry's own bibliography. Every citation key on this page resolves into this list.

  1. ArmaLite AR-18 · Wikipedia · 1369819561 · read 2026-09-09 · CC BY-SA 4.0

Last verified 2026-09-09 · review status: agent-populated